4.6 Article

Artificially-generated consolidations and balanced augmentation increase performance of U-net for lung parenchyma segmentation on MR images

Journal

PLOS ONE
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285378

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to improve automated lung segmentation on 2D lung MR images using balanced augmentation and artificially-generated consolidations for training of a convolutional neural network (CNN). The results showed that by increasing balanced augmentation and artificially-generated consolidations, the CNN performance was improved, especially in datasets with parenchymal consolidations. This is an important step towards a robust automated postprocessing of lung MRI datasets in clinical routine.
PurposeTo improve automated lung segmentation on 2D lung MR images using balanced augmentation and artificially-generated consolidations for training of a convolutional neural network (CNN). Materials and methodsFrom 233 healthy volunteers and 100 patients, 1891 coronal MR images were acquired. Of these, 1666 images without consolidations were used to build a binary semantic CNN for lung segmentation and 225 images (187 without consolidations, 38 with consolidations) were used for testing. To increase CNN performance of segmenting lung parenchyma with consolidations, balanced augmentation was performed and artificially-generated consolidations were added to all training images. The proposed CNN (CNNBal/Cons) was compared to two other CNNs: CNNUnbal/NoCons-without balanced augmentation and artificially-generated consolidations and CNNBal/NoCons-with balanced augmentation but without artificially-generated consolidations. Segmentation results were assessed using Sorensen-Dice coefficient (SDC) and Hausdorff distance coefficient. ResultsRegarding the 187 MR test images without consolidations, the mean SDC of CNNUnbal/NoCons (92.1 +/- 6% (mean +/- standard deviation)) was significantly lower compared to CNNBal/NoCons (94.0 +/- 5.3%, P = 0.0013) and CNNBal/Cons (94.3 +/- 4.1%, P = 0.0001). No significant difference was found between SDC of CNNBal/Cons and CNNBal/NoCons (P = 0.54).For the 38 MR test images with consolidations, SDC of CNNUnbal/NoCons (89.0 +/- 7.1%) was not significantly different compared to CNNBal/NoCons (90.2 +/- 9.4%, P = 0.53). SDC of CNNBal/Cons (94.3 +/- 3.7%) was significantly higher compared to CNNBal/NoCons (P = 0.0146) and CNNUnbal/NoCons (P = 0.001). ConclusionsExpanding training datasets via balanced augmentation and artificially-generated consolidations improved the accuracy of CNNBal/Cons, especially in datasets with parenchymal consolidations. This is an important step towards a robust automated postprocessing of lung MRI datasets in clinical routine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available