4.7 Article

CO2-induced chloroplast movement in one cell-layer moss leaves

Journal

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 46, Issue 8, Pages 2358-2375

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pce.14615

Keywords

Bryophyta; carbon dioxide; cytoskeletons; light; orientation (spatial); photosynthesis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CO2-induced chloroplast movement in moss plants was found to be dependent on light and photosynthetic activity. The relocation of chloroplasts was influenced by both microfilaments and microtubules, and was observed in different CO2 concentrations.
CO2-induced chloroplast movement was reported in the monograph by Gustav Senn in 1908: unilateral CO2 supply to the one cell-layered moss leaves induced the positively CO2-tactic periclinal arrangement of chloroplasts. Here, using the model moss plant Physcomitrium patens, we examined basic features of chloroplast CO2-tactic relocation with a modernized experimental system. The CO2 relocation was light-dependent and, especially, CO2 relocation in red light was substantially dependent on photosynthetic activity. In blue light, CO2 relocation was mainly dependent on microfilaments while microtubule-based movement was insensitive to CO2, whereas in red light, both cytoskeletons contributed redundantly to CO2 relocation. The CO2 relocation was observed not only when the two leaf surfaces were exposed to CO2-free air versus CO2-containing air, but also by exposing them physiologically relevant differences in CO2 concentrations. In the leaves placed on the surface of a gel sheet, chloroplasts avoided the gel side and positioned in the air-facing surface, and this phenomenon was also shown to be photosynthesis dependent. Based on these observations, we propose a hypothesis that the threshold light intensity between the light-accumulation and -avoidance responses of the photorelocation would be increased by CO2, resulting in the CO2-tactic relocation of chloroplasts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available