4.2 Review

Patient-reported outcomes in refractory hormone-producing pituitary adenomas: an unmet need

Journal

PITUITARY
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages 307-317

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11102-023-01309-4

Keywords

Pituitary adenomas; Refractory adenomas; Functioning adenomas; Patient-reported outcome measure; Health-related quality of life; Quality of reporting

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to describe the quality and outcomes of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in patients with refractory hormone-producing pituitary adenomas. The results showed that there is a wide variation in the health-related quality of life in refractory patients, and it is not always impaired compared to patients in remission.
PurposeTo describe quality and outcomes of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures (PROMs) used in patients with refractory hormone-producing pituitary adenomas, and to provide an overview of PROs in these challenging pituitary adenomas.MethodsThree databases were searched for studies reporting on refractory pituitary adenomas. For the purpose of this review, refractory adenomas were defined as tumors resistant to primary therapy. General risk of bias was assessed using a component approach and the quality of PROM reporting was assessed using the International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) criteria.Results20 studies reported on PROMs in refractory pituitary adenomas, using 14 different PROMs, of which 4 were disease specific (median general risk of bias score: 33.5% (range 6-50%) and ISOQOL score: 46% (range 29-62%)). SF-36/RAND-36 and AcroQoL were most frequently used. Health-related quality of life in refractory patients (measured by AcroQoL, SF-36/Rand-36, Tuebingen CD-25, and EQ-5D-5L) varied greatly across studies, and was not always impaired compared to patients in remission.ConclusionThere is a scarcity of data on PROs in the subset of pituitary adenomas that is more difficult to treat, e.g., refractory and these patients are difficult to isolate from the total cohort. The patients' perspective on quality of life, therefore, remains largely unknown in refractory patients. Thus, PROs in refractory pituitary adenomas require adequate analysis using properly reported disease specific PROMs in large cohorts to enable appropriate interpretation for use in clinical practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available