4.7 Article

New testing method for the evaluation of topographical gradients of varying strength

Journal

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0147239

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Passive gradient motion in nature has been studied in the context of heat exchange and green energy technologies. This work presents a method for examining variable-pitch micro/nanoengineered hierarchical superhydrophobic gradients, which can potentially enhance heat exchanger performance and delay icing on wind turbines. The method combines experimental, numerical, and force analysis approaches and has been validated against numerical calculations.
Passive gradient motion found in nature is becoming a point of interest for heat exchange and green energy technologies. Surfaces with a topographical gradient could potentially enhance heat exchanger performance, promote dropwise vs filmwise condensation, or delay icing on wind turbines by assisting in the removal of condensed or impacted droplets. Coating-free topographical surface tension gradients can be fabricated via various methods and need to be examined in terms of their capability for spontaneous droplet motion. In this work, a simple experimental method, coupled with numerical modeling and force analysis, for examining variable-pitch micro/nanoengineered hierarchical superhydrophobic gradients is shown. The method was validated against numerical calculations, allowing the strength of the gradients to be compared. In most cases, model predictions for droplet travel distance and velocity were within 20% of the measured data. This method could also be useful for gradient design improvements in the absence of spontaneous motion on a horizontal surface. VC 2023 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0147239

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available