4.0 Article

Exclusive Mass-Energy Distributions of the Fast Fission Fragments in the 40Ca+144Sm Reaction

Journal

PHYSICS OF ATOMIC NUCLEI
Volume 86, Issue 2, Pages 56-69

Publisher

PLEIADES PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.1134/S1063778823020126

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The dependence of the properties of fission fragments on the angular momentum in fusion-fission and fast fission processes remains unclear. In this study, the mass-energy distributions of fast fission fragments of Pb-184 were measured in the Ca-40 + Sm-144 reaction. The results show that the most probable fragments in fast fission of Pb-184 are asymmetric fragments with masses of 76 and 108 u, and the distributions of these fragments change weakly with an increase in Ca-40 energy.
The dependence of the properties of the fission fragments formed both in the fusion-fission and fast fission processes on the angular momentum still remains very unclear from an experimental as well as theoretical point of view. To study the properties of fast fission fragments of preactinide nuclei as function of the interaction energy and introduced angular momentum, the mass-energy distributions of Pb-184 fission fragments formed in the Ca-40 + Sm-144 reaction at energies above the Coulomb barrier have been measured using the double-arm time-of-flight spectrometer CORSET at the Ca-40 ions' energies of 212, 231, 244, and 277 MeV. The mass-energy distributions of the fast fission fragments have been extracted by subtracting the mass-energy matrices corresponding to the compound nucleus fission from those of all measured fissionlike events. The asymmetric fragments with masses 76 and 108 u were found to be the most probable in the fast fission of Pb-184. With increasing Ca-40 energy from 231 to 277 MeV the mass distributions of fast fission fragments change weakly, whereas an increase in the TKE is about 20 MeV. The properties found for the fast fission fragments indicate the incomplete mass relaxation and not full energy dissipation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available