4.8 Article

Stochastic Approach to the Quantum Noise of a Single-Emitter Nanolaser

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 130, Issue 25, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.253801

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A stochastic interpretation of the standard rate equation model accurately computes the quantum intensity noise of a single-emitter nanolaser. By assuming that the emitter excitation and photon number are stochastic variables with integer values, this model extends the validity of rate equations and avoids the failure of the standard Langevin approach for few emitters. The model is validated by comparing it to full quantum simulations and provides insight into the fundamental nature of quantum noise in lasers.
It is shown that the quantum intensity noise of a single-emitter nanolaser can be accurately computed by adopting a stochastic interpretation of the standard rate equation model. The only assumption made is that the emitter excitation and photon number are stochastic variables with integer values. This extends the validity of rate equations beyond the mean-field limit and avoids using the standard Langevin approach, which is shown to fail for few emitters. The model is validated by comparison to full quantum simulations of the relative intensity noise and second-order intensity correlation function, g(2)(0). Surprisingly, even when the full quantum model displays vacuum Rabi oscillations, which are not accounted for by rate equations, the intensity quantum noise is correctly predicted by the stochastic approach. Adopting a simple discretization of the emitter and photon populations, thus, goes a long way in describing quantum noise in lasers. Besides providing a versatile and easy-to-use tool for modeling emerging nanolasers, these results provide insight into the fundamental nature of quantum noise in lasers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available