4.8 Article

Anisotropic Melting of Frustrated Ising Antiferromagnets

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 130, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.166701

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, large-scale Monte Carlo simulations were used to investigate the melting process of magnetic long-range order in a frustrated Ising spin model in two spatial dimensions. It was found that the melting of the magnetic long-range order proceeded through an intermediate stage where the classical spins remained anisotropically correlated. This correlated paramagnet existed in a temperature range TN < T < T*, and its width increased with growing magnetic frustrations. Additionally, the two-dimensional nature of the model allowed for the formation of an incommensurate liquidlike phase with algebraically decaying spin correlations.
Magnetic frustrations and dimensionality play an important role in determining the nature of the magnetic long-range order and how it melts at temperatures above the ordering transition TN. In this Letter, we use large-scale Monte Carlo simulations to study these phenomena in a class of frustrated Ising spin models in two spatial dimensions. We find that the melting of the magnetic long-range order into an isotropic gaslike paramagnet proceeds via an intermediate stage where the classical spins remain anisotropically correlated. This correlated paramagnet exists in a temperature range TN < T < T*, whose width increases as magnetic frustrations grow. This intermediate phase is typically characterized by shortrange correlations; however, the two-dimensional nature of the model allows for an additional exotic feature-formation of an incommensurate liquidlike phase with algebraically decaying spin correlations. The two-stage melting of magnetic order is generic and pertinent to many frustrated quasi-2D magnets with large (essentially classical) spins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available