4.3 Review

Characterizing Curie and Neel Point Phase Transitions via Thermal Techniques

Journal

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/pssb.202300008

Keywords

Curie and Neel transitions; differential scanning calorimetry; first-order transitions; magnetic materials; second-order transitions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Different magnetic materials have different transition temperatures, which are crucial for applications. Thermal methods, such as DSC, are commonly used for measuring Curie and Neel transitions. However, there is still confusion regarding the efficacy and analysis of these measurements.
Various magnetic materials (for example, ferro, ferri, antiferromagnetic) are characterized by their respective transition temperatures (for example, Curie and Neel transitions). Knowledge of these transition temperatures is vital from an application standpoint. Accurate measurements by suitable characterization techniques are needed for identifying these transitions. Several techniques have been used to identify Curie and Neel transition temperatures, with thermal methods being one of the preferred choice. These thermal methods include differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), differential thermal analysis, and thermogravimetric analysis. Although thermal analysis tools have been popularly used for examining magnetic phase transitions, still much confusion exists on their efficacy and might. This review article highlights the strength and limitations of measuring Curie and Neel transitions by thermal techniques; measurements by DSC were the most common choice in previous works. Considering the intrinsic/fundamental nature of these Curie/Neel transitions, such confusion on their measurements (by thermal techniques) and their subsequent analysis (for the order of transition) suggests that a more comprehensive understanding of the events should be an immediate future goal for the research community, at large.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available