4.7 Article

The α9α10 acetylcholine receptor: A non-neuronal nicotinic receptor

Journal

PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 190, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2023.106735

Keywords

Nicotinic receptors; Ligand-gated channels; Hair cells; Cochlea; Hearing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Within the nAChR family, alpha 9 and alpha 10 subunits are distinct and distant members, forming a distinct clade in the phylogeny of nAChRs. They function as canonical ion channels in inner ear hair cells and play a role in the central nervous system control of auditory and vestibular sensory processing. Therefore, they deserve their own name based on their main synaptic site of action.
Within the superfamily of pentameric ligand-gated ion channels, cholinergic nicotinic receptors (nAChRs) were classically identified to mediate synaptic transmission in the nervous system and the neuromuscular junction. The alpha 9 and alpha 10 nAChR subunits were the last ones to be identified. Surprisingly, they do not fall into the dichotomic neuronal/muscle classification of nAChRs. They assemble into heteropentamers with a well-established function as canonical ion channels in inner ear hair cells, where they mediate central nervous system control of auditory and vestibular sensory processing. The present review includes expression, pharmacological, structure-function, molecular evolution and pathophysiological studies, that define receptors composed from alpha 9 and alpha 10 subunits as distant and distinct members within the nAChR family. Thus, although alpha 9 and alpha 10 were initially included within the neuronal subdivision of nAChR subunits, they form a distinct clade within the phylogeny of nAChRs. Following the classification of nAChR subunits based on their main synaptic site of action, alpha 9 and alpha 10 should receive a name in their own right.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available