4.3 Article

MRI Susceptibility Changes Suggestive of Iron Deposition in the Thalamus after Ischemic Stroke

Journal

CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES
Volume 40, Issue 1-2, Pages 67-72

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000433560

Keywords

Ischemic stroke; Magnetic resonance imaging; Thalamus; Stroke pathophysiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Iron accumulation has been linked to neuronal injury following cerebral ischemia. In animals, a hypointense signal on T2*-weighted (T2*-w) MRI correlated with iron deposits in remote brain regions following ischemic stroke. We aim to assess whether such signal changes are present in remote brain structures following ischemic stroke in humans. Methods: We analyzed T2*-w images of 36 patients with unilateral ischemic stroke and 36 healthy controls. Regions of interest (ROIs) consisted of the thalamus, putamen, globus pallidus, caudate nucleus and white matter. To quantify signal intensity in ROIs ipsilateral to the infarct, signal intensity was measured in the ROIs in both hemispheres and a ratio of signal intensity was calculated. Signal asymmetry was compared between patients and controls and its relation with time after stroke onset was assessed. Results: In 34 (94%) patients, the thalamus ipsilateral to the infarct was hypointense compared to the contralateral thalamus. Ipsilateral thalamic signal hypointensity was significantly different between patients and controls (p < 0.001) and was present as early as 1 day after stroke onset. In other ROIs, no difference was found between patients and controls. No association was found between intensity asymmetry and time. Conclusion: We demonstrated that, as early as days after ischemic stroke, T2*-w signal intensity was decreased in the ipsilateral thalamus. This finding might indicate pathophysiologic changes in regions outside the infarcted area, possibly reflecting toxic iron accumulation. (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available