4.2 Article

N-acetyltransferase 2 haplotype modifies risks for both dyslipidemia and urinary bladder cancer

Journal

PHARMACOGENETICS AND GENOMICS
Volume 33, Issue 6, Pages 136-137

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/FPC.0000000000000500

Keywords

dyslipidemia; N-acetyltransferase 2 haplotype; rs1495741; urinary bladder cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel NAT2 haplotype composed of seven non-coding variants has been linked to dyslipidemia and bladder cancer. The risk alleles of this haplotype are associated with different levels of NAT2 gene expression, suggesting a role in modifying the risk of these diseases.
A novel haplotype in N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) composed of seven non-coding variants (rs1495741, rs4921913, rs4921914, rs4921915, rs146812806, rs35246381, and rs35570672) has been linked to dyslipidemia by multiple, independent genome-wide association studies. The haplotype is located approximately 14 kb downstream of NAT2-coding region (ch8:18,272,377-18,272,881; GRCh38/hg38) and represents a non-coding, intergenic haplotype. Interestingly, the same dyslipidemia NAT2 haplotype is also linked to urinary bladder cancer risk. Dyslipidemia risk alleles are associated with rapid acetylator phenotype, whereas bladder cancer risk alleles are associated with slow acetylator, suggesting that the level of systemic NAT2 activity modifies the risk of these pathologies. We speculate that rs1495741 (and its associated haplotype) belongs to a distal regulatory element of human NAT2 gene (e.g., enhancer or silencer), and the genetic variation at the newly discovered haplotype results in a differential level of NAT2 gene expression. Understanding how this NAT2 haplotype contributes to not only urinary bladder cancer but also to dyslipidemia will ultimately help devise strategies to identify and protect susceptible individuals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available