4.7 Article

Mitigate the classification ambiguity via localization-classification sequence in object detection

Journal

PATTERN RECOGNITION
Volume 138, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2023.109418

Keywords

Object detection; Classification ambiguity; Refinement -aware classification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In anchor-based detectors, classification ambiguity caused by the lack of correlation between classification and localization tasks is investigated. A localization-classification sequence detector (LCSDet) is proposed to bridge this gap, with refinement-aware classification branch and assignment. The LCSDet effectively mitigates the classification ambiguity and achieves stable improvement across different baselines.
In anchor-based detectors, the confidence scores and label-assignment results for the classification task are determined by the unrefined anchors rather than the final-refined boxes, which causes classifica-tion ambiguity due to the lack of correlation between the classification and localization tasks. In this paper, we investigate the classification ambiguity thoroughly via extensive experiments, and present the localization-classification sequence detector (LCSDet) that performs localization and classification in or-der, bridging the gap between them. To achieve this, the refinement-aware (RA) classification branch and RA assignment are proposed in LCSDet. In inference, the RA classification branch rectifies the fea-ture misalignment and directly classifies the refined anchors. During training, the RA assignment tackles the training instability, narrows the location-quality gap and assigns the refined anchors to ground-truth objects. Comprehensive experiments indicate that the LCSDet can effectively mitigate the classification ambiguity and achieve stable improvement across different baselines.(c) 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available