4.1 Article

Outcomes in orthotopic heart transplantation following pacemaker implantation

Journal

PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 7, Pages 583-591

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pace.14716

Keywords

atrioventricular block; heart transplantation; permanent pacemaker; sinus node dysfunction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of hormone-induced arrhythmia and atrioventricular block on retransplant survival in heart transplant patients. The results showed that hormone-induced arrhythmia patients do not require pacemaker implantation, while pacemaker implantation can reduce the risk of death or retransplant in patients with atrioventricular block.
BackgroundBradyarrhythmias including sinus node dysfunction (SND) and atrioventricular block (AVB) can necessitate pacemaker (PPM) implantation in orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) recipients. Prior studies have shown conflicting findings regarding the effect of PPM implantation on survival. We evaluated the effect of PPM indication on long-term re-transplant-free survival in OHT patients. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of OHT patients at UCLA Medical Center from 1985 to 2018. Indication for PPM (SND, AVB) was identified. Cox proportional hazards model with pacemaker implantation as a time-varying covariate was used to evaluate its effect on the primary endpoint of retransplant or death. We included 1609 OHTs in 1511 adult patients with median follow-up of 12 years. ResultsAt transplant, patients were aged 53 +/- 13 years and 1125 (74.5%) were male. Pacemakers were implanted in 109 (7.2%) patients; 65 for SND (4.3%) and 43 for AVB (2.8%). Repeat OHT was performed in 103 (6.4%) cases and 798 (52.8%) patients died during the follow-up period. The risk of the primary endpoint was significantly higher in patients requiring PPM for AVB (HR 3.0, 95% CI 2.1-4.2, p < .01) after controlling for age at OHT, gender, hypertension, diabetes, renal disease, history of repeat OHT, acute rejection, transplant coronary vasculopathy, and atrial fibrillation, but not PPM for SND (HR 1.0, 95% CI 0.70-1.4, p = 1.0). ConclusionsPatients who required PPM for AVB, but not SND, were at significantly higher risk of death or retransplant compared to patients who did not require PPM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available