4.2 Review

The Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Vestibular Schwannoma Management: A Single Institution Review

Journal

OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue 5, Pages 507-512

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003883

Keywords

Area deprivation index; Health disparities; Management; Vestibular schwannoma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to evaluate the impact of social determinants of health on the management of vestibular schwannoma (VS). A retrospective chart review of 811 patients revealed that social determinants of health, including race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, were associated with treatment recommendations. Factors such as patient age, area deprivation index (ADI), and tumor grade influenced the treatment recommendation.
ObjectiveTo evaluate social determinants of health and their effect on the management of vestibular schwannoma (VS).Study DesignRetrospective chart review.SettingTertiary referral center.PatientsPatients >18 years old with sporadic VS newly diagnosed between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020.Intervention(s)Magnetic resonance imaging; audiogram; treatment recommendations.Main Outcome Measure(s)Differences in treatment recommendations for patients based on their social determinants of health, including race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status.ResultsA total of 811 patients were included in analysis. Patients with a higher area deprivation index (ADI) presented with larger tumors. A higher ADI was associated with a higher likelihood of recommending radiation (or the option of surgery or radiation) compared with a recommendation of surgery alone. Tumor grade and patient age were significantly associated with treatment recommendation. Older age was associated with a recommendation of observation alone or a recommendation of radiation. Higher tumor grade was associated with a recommendation of surgery. There was a trend for higher hearing class to be associated with a recommendation of surgery, but this did not reach statistical significance. Race, ethnicity, and gender were not significantly associated with treatment recommendation.ConclusionsPatients with higher levels of disadvantage presented with higher tumor grade, suggesting that access to care influences diagnosis. Factors including age, ADI, and tumor grade were associated with treatment recommendation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available