3D analysis of maxillomandibular morphology in hyperdivergent and hypodivergent individuals: A cross-sectional study

Introduction: The aim of this crosssectional study was to investigate maxillomandibular morphology in hyperdivergent and hypodivergent individuals, using 3D surface models generated by cone -beam computed tomography (CBCT).Methods: The sample consisted of 60 CBCTs (30 males, 30 females) patients aged 12- 30 years, divided into two groups comprising hyperdivergent (=35 degrees) and hypodivergent (=30 degrees) individuals, according to the mandibular plane (MP) angle. Multiplanar reconstructions were used to mark the landmarks, and 3D surface models were created to evaluate structures of the maxillomandibular complex, including condyle, ramus, symphysis and palatal height. Intergroup comparisons were performed by independent t -test. Pearson's correlation test was used (P < .05) to evaluate the correlation of the MP angle with the angles and linear measurements of other structures.Results: Significant differences were found between the groups regarding condylar width, ramus height, condylar plus ramus height, mandibular length, gonial angle, palatal plane angle and palatal-mandibular angle. No differences (P > .05) were found for the condylar height, symphysis inclination angle or palatal height. Correlations (P < .05) were found between the MP angle and structures of the maxillomandibular complex.Conclusions: Hyperdivergent (MP = 35) and hypodivergent (MP = 30 degrees) individuals present different skeletal morphology regarding condylar width, ramus height, condylar plus ramus height, mandibular length, gonial angle, palatal plane angle and palatal-mandibular angle. There is a significant correlation between MP angle and morphological structures such as condyle, ramus, symphysis, palatal plane angle and palatal-mandibular angle.

Automated summary

This study investigated maxillomandibular morphology in hyperdivergent and hypodivergent individuals using 3D surface models generated by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The sample consisted of 60 CBCTs patients and significant differences were found between the two groups regarding various skeletal measurements. There is a significant correlation between the mandibular plane (MP) angle and morphological structures of the maxillomandibular complex.