4.6 Article

Investigation of the cap layer for improved GeSn multiple quantum well laser performance

Journal

OPTICS LETTERS
Volume 48, Issue 7, Pages 1626-1629

Publisher

Optica Publishing Group
DOI: 10.1364/OL.484837

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study focuses on SiGeSn lasers, which have opened up new possibilities for Si-based light sources. SiGeSn heterostructure and quantum well lasers have been successfully demonstrated in recent years. The research shows that adding a cap layer can improve the optical confinement factor of Fabry-Perot cavity lasers. SiGeSn/GeSn multiple quantum well devices with different cap layer thicknesses were grown, and the performance of these devices was characterized. The results provide guidance for the design of electrically injected SiGeSn quantum well lasers.
The study of all-group-IV SiGeSn lasers has opened a new avenue to Si-based light sources. SiGeSn heterostructure and quantum well lasers have been successfully demonstrated in the past few years. It has been reported that, for multiple quantum well lasers, the optical confinement factor plays an important role in the net modal gain. In previous studies, adding a cap layer was proposed to increase the optical mode overlap with the active region and thereby improve the optical confinement factor of Fabry-Perot cavity lasers. In this work, SiGeSn/GeSn multiple quantum well (4-well) devices with various cap layer thicknesses, i.e., 0 (no cap), 190, 250, and 290 nm, are grown using a chemical vapor deposition reactor and characterized via optical pumping. While no-cap and thinner-cap devices only show spontaneous emission, the two thicker-cap devices exhibit lasing up to 77 K, with an emission peak at 2440 nm and a threshold of 214 kW/cm(2) (250 nm cap device). The clear trend in device performance disclosed in this work provides guidance in device design for electrically injected SiGeSn quantum well lasers. (C) 2023 Optica Publishing Group

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available