4.7 Review

Characterization of strain field distribution in carbon fiber reinforced resin matrix composites using electron beam moire and geometric phase analysis

Journal

OPTICS AND LASERS IN ENGINEERING
Volume 163, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2022.107457

Keywords

Carbon fiber; Fracture; Micro-mechanics; Electron microscopy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the meso and nanoscopic deformation behavior of carbon-fiber reinforced resin matrix composites under tensile loading was investigated. In situ scanning electron microscopy combined with electron beam moire and geometric phase analysis techniques were used to measure and analyze the strain field distribution. A cross-grating with a pitch of 359 nm was fabricated on the surface of the composite material using electron beam lithography. The strain field distribution around different types of cracks and the ineffective length of broken fibers were characterized using geometric phase analysis.
The meso and nanoscopic deformation behavior of the carbon-fiber reinforced resin matrix composite during ten-sile loading were investigated via in situ scanning electron microscopy combined with the electron beam moire and geometric phase analysis (GPA) techniques. Electron beam lithography was used to fabricate a cross-grating with a pitch of 359 nm (2780 lines/mm) on the surface of the composite material to facilitate the direct measure-ment of the deformation. In situ observation of the composite subjected to tension were conducted to determine strain filed distribution under different loads. The global and local strain field were measured and analyzed at the meso and nanoscale. The strain field distribution around matrix transverse crack, cracks between fibers, inter-laminar cracks, and broken fiber cracks were characterized via GPA under load. The strain concentration factor and the ineffective length of the broken fiber were also measured experimentally.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available