4.5 Article

Culture of circulating tumor cells using a microfilter device

Journal

ONCOLOGY REPORTS
Volume 49, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/or.2023.8538

Keywords

circulating tumor cell; pancreatic cancer; microfilter device; cluster; colony

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to establish a new approach to capture and cultivate circulating tumor cells (CTCs) using a microfilter device. Whole blood samples were collected from patients with pancreatic cancer, and CTCs were isolated and cultured on the microfilter. The study found that CTCs and/or CTC clusters could be observed during long-term culture.
Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are associated with cancer metastasis and prognosis but their scarcity in whole blood prevents their use as a diagnostic tool. The purpose of the present study was to establish a novel approach to capture and cultivate CTCs using a microfilter device. The present study was a prospective study of patients with pancreatic cancer at the University of Tsukuba Hospital (Tsukuba, Japan). From each patient, 5 ml of whole blood was collected into an EDTA collection tube. Whole blood was filtered to isolate CTCs and cells captured on the microfilter were cultured in place. A total of 15 patients were enrolled. CTCs and/or CTC clusters were detected in 2 of 6 cases on day 0. In all cases, CTCs and/or formed clusters and/or colonies were observed during long-term culture periods of up to 103 days. In samples where CTCs were not immediately evident, CTC clusters and colonies emerged after long-term culture. To confirm activity of the cultured CTCs on the filters, staining with Calcein AM was performed and epithelial cellular adhesion molecule-positive cells were observed. The system enables the capture and culture of CTCs. Cultured CTCs may be used for patient-specific drug susceptibility testing and genomic profiling of cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available