4.8 Article

Excessive transcription-replication conflicts are a vulnerability of BRCA1-mutant cancers

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 51, Issue 9, Pages 4341-4362

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkad172

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BRCA1 mutations increase the risk of breast and ovarian cancer. This study identified MEPCE and PAF1 as synthetic lethal partners of BRCA1 by targeting CRISPR-Cas9 screening. Depletion of MEPCE and PAF1 resulted in dysregulated RNAPII promoter-proximal pausing, R-loop accumulation, replication stress, and genomic instability, leading to the loss of viability in BRCA1-deficient cells. These findings suggest that targeting transcription-replication collision-inducing factors could be a potential therapeutic approach for cancers associated with BRCA1 mutations.
BRCA1 mutations are associated with increased breast and ovarian cancer risk. BRCA1-mutant tumors are high-grade, recurrent, and often become resistant to standard therapies. Herein, we performed a targeted CRISPR-Cas9 screen and identified MEPCE, a methylphosphate capping enzyme, as a synthetic lethal interactor of BRCA1. Mechanistically, we demonstrate that depletion of MEPCE in a BRCA1-deficient setting led to dysregulated RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) promoter-proximal pausing, R-loop accumulation, and replication stress, contributing to transcription-replication collisions. These collisions compromise genomic integrity resulting in loss of viability of BRCA1-deficient cells. We also extend these findings to another RNAPII-regulating factor, PAF1. This study identifies a new class of synthetic lethal partners of BRCA1 that exploit the RNAPII pausing regulation and highlight the untapped potential of transcription-replication collision-inducing factors as unique potential therapeutic targets for treating cancers associated with BRCA1 mutations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available