4.6 Article

Performance of compact plastic scintillator strips with wavelength shifting fibers using a photomultiplier tube or silicon photomultiplier readout

Journal

NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNIQUES
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER SINGAPORE PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s41365-023-01175-6

Keywords

PMT; SiPM; Plastic scintillator; WLS-fiber; Muon detection; Efficiency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents the design and performance results for compact plastic scintillator strips using a wavelength shifting fiber (WLS-fiber) readout. The strips were evaluated as a candidate for a cosmic-ray muon detector. The performance of the strips was determined by detailed characterization and measurement using 3-inch photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) and silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs). The proposed design provides a good choice for cosmic-ray muon veto detectors when space is limited.
This study presents the design and performance results for compact plastic scintillator strips using a wavelength shifting fiber (WLS-fiber) readout with dimensions of 0.1 m x 0.02 m x 2 m . This approach was evaluated as a candidate for a cosmic-ray muon detector for the Taishan Antineutrino Observatory (JUNO-TAO). The strips coupled with 3-inch photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) were measured and compared between the single-end and double-end readout options. Additionally, a strip using the double-end option coupling with a silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) was further evaluated and compared with the results obtained using PMTs. The performance of the strips was determined by a detailed survey along their length with a cosmic ray muon after detailed characterization of the 3-inch PMTs and SiPMs. The proposed design employing a compact plastic scintillator strip with WLS-fiber coupling to a SiPM provides a good choice for cosmic-ray muon veto detectors, particularly when detector dimensions must be limited.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available