4.5 Article

Acoustic emission data classification of 18 percent Ni maraging steel 250 specimens during tensile deformation

Journal

NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING AND EVALUATION
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10589759.2023.2185238

Keywords

Acoustic emission; non-destructive evaluation; tensile failure; AE parameters

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acoustic emission (AE) evaluation is a significant Nondestructive Testing technique for detecting growing defects during the application of force on structures. In this study, different types of specimens of 18% Ni Maraging steel 250 grade are used to record AE parameters, which are important for assessing the structural integrity of these steel structures.
Acoustic emission (AE) evaluation is an important Nondestructive Testing technique. The technique is a whole field passive technique that detects defects that are growing during the application of force on the structure. At a certain threshold, AE starts emanating from the structure while the structure is stressed by tensile deformation. 18% Ni Maraging steel 250 grade material is widely used in the aerospace industry and exhibits fracture behaviour. In the current study, tensile specimens are used and acoustic emissionAE parameters are recorded. Four types of specimens Type A, Type B, Type C and Type D specimens are designated as heat -affected zone, parent metal, defect -free weldment and weld with notch defect, respectively. These specimens are tensile deformed in order to obtain acoustic emissionAE parameters at 60% of failure load (FL), 60-75% of FL, 75-90% of FL and 90% to FL. AE parameters - amplitude, ring down counts, duration, rise time, energy, RA value, DA value, hit rate, count rate and energy rate - are tabulated for various failure loadFLs. These parameters have vital importance in critical assessment of the structural integrity of 18% Ni Maraging steel 250 structures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available