4.6 Review

The Vessel Has Been Recanalized: Now What?

Journal

NEUROTHERAPEUTICS
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages 679-692

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13311-023-01367-3

Keywords

Stroke; Recanalization; Reperfusion; Pathophysiology; Neuroprotection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In clinical practice, achieving recanalization of occluded blood vessels is an important goal for treating acute ischemic stroke patients. However, successful recanalization does not guarantee successful reperfusion of ischemic tissue, and various post-recanalization tissue damage mechanisms can impair patient outcomes. Understanding the prevalence and importance of these mechanisms is crucial for identifying promising cerebroprotectants and designing effective clinical trials. Serial human MRI studies combined with animal studies could provide valuable insights and help accelerate the translation of cerebroprotective agents from bench to bedside.
When treating acute ischemic stroke patients in our daily clinical practice, we strive to achieve recanalization of the occluded blood vessel as fast as possible using pharmacological thrombolysis and mechanical clot removal. However, successful recanalization does not equal successful reperfusion of the ischemic tissue due to mechanisms such as microvascular obstruction. Even if successful reperfusion is achieved, numerous other post-recanalization tissue damage mechanisms may impair patient outcomes, namely blood-brain barrier breakdown, reperfusion injury and excitotoxicity, late secondary changes, and post-infarction local and global brain atrophy. Several cerebroprotectants are currently evaluated as adjunctive treatments to pharmacological thrombolysis and mechanical clot removal, many of which interfere with post-recanalization tissue damage pathways. However, our current lack of knowledge about the prevalence and importance of the various post-recanalization tissue damage mechanisms makes it difficult to reliably identify the most promising cerebroprotectants and to design appropriate clinical trials to evaluate them. Serial human MRI studies with complementary animal studies in higher order primates could provide answers to these critical questions and should be first conducted to allow for adequate cerebroprotection trial design, which could accelerate the translation of cerebroprotective agents from bench to bedside to further improve patient outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available