4.4 Article

Late ERP correlates of confidence for auditory categorization of complex sounds

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS
Volume 808, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2023.137294

Keywords

Confidence; Metacognition; ERP; EEG; Late posterior positivity; P3

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent research has shown that confidence is related to the quality of sensory representations and processing stages in the brain. This study used EEG to investigate the neural correlates of confidence in an auditory categorization task. The results suggest that the late posterior positivity (LPP) is an indicator of confidence in this task, regardless of the difficulty level.
Recent research suggests that confidence judgments relate to the quality of early sensory representations and later modality independent processing stages. It is not known whether the nature of this finding might vary based on task and/or stimulus characteristics (e.g., detection vs. categorization). The present study investigated the neural correlates of confidence using electroencephalography (EEG) in an auditory categorization task. This allowed us to examine whether the early event-related potentials (ERPs) related to confidence in detection also apply to a more complex auditory task. Participants listened to frequency-modulated (FM) tonal stimuli going up or down in pitch. The rate of FM tones ranged from slow to fast, making the stimuli harder or easier to categorize. Tone-locked late posterior positivity (LPP) but not N1 or P2 amplitudes were larger for (correct-only) trials rated with high than low confidence. These results replicated for trials presenting stimuli at individually identified threshold levels (rate of change producing similar to 71.7% correct performance). This finding suggests that, in this task, neural correlates of confidence do not vary based on difficulty level. We suggest that the LPP is a task general indication of the confidence for an upcoming judgment in a variety of paradigms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available