4.7 Article

Editors' Note: Prospective Natural History Study in 24 Adult Patients With LGMDR12 Over 2 Years of Follow-up: Quantitative MRI and Clinical Outcome Measures

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 100, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000206870

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This prospective study investigated 24 patients with LGMDR12 and found that patients with intermediate-stage fatty replacement showed significant worsening in Biodex Isometric Dynamometry after 1 year, while their clinical assessments did not show apparent deterioration over a 2-year period. The researchers suggest that this quantitative tool can be useful in monitoring disease progression and treatment response in LGMDR12.
De Wel et al. prospectively studied 24 patients with autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 12 (LGMDR12). Patients with LGMDR12 had no appreciable clinical worsening over a 2-year period according to repeated standardized clinical assessments, such as the 6-minute walk distance, 10-meter walk test, or Medical Research Council sum scores of muscle power. However, for patients with LGMDR12 and intermediate-stage fatty replacement of muscle tissue (20%-70% proton density fat fraction), there was a significant worsening of Biodex Isometric Dynamometry even after 1 year. The investigators conclude this quantitative tool may be useful in monitoring clinical progression and response to targeted treatments for LGMDR12. Dr. Kawada expresses a concern regarding lead-time bias in the cohort (unclear time of disease onset in a recessive condition) which may have confounded any differences in the various qualitative and quantitative assessments over time. In response, the investigators confirmed that patients were included at the time of clinical symptom onset. Both investigators agree that sex-related differences in disease progression are less well understood, and additional studies are suggested to explore reasons for the variability in prognosis between sexes and age groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available