4.7 Article

Moving from phenomenological to predictive modelling: Progress and pitfalls of modelling brain stimulation in-silico

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 272, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120042

Keywords

phenomenological models; biophysical models; oscillatory models; brain stimulation; model construction; parameter optimisation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Brain stimulation is a popular tool in clinical and research settings, but its effects are variable. Computational models can help explore the effects of different stimulation parameters on brain activity. However, these models need to accurately capture the dynamics of neural populations and the underlying networks to be effective. This article focuses on the use of computational models in non-invasive brain stimulation and discusses common construction choices and limitations of these models through case studies.
Brain stimulation is an increasingly popular neuromodulatory tool used in both clinical and research settings; however, the effects of brain stimulation, particularly those of non-invasive stimulation, are variable. This vari-ability can be partially explained by an incomplete mechanistic understanding, coupled with a combinatorial explosion of possible stimulation parameters. Computational models constitute a useful tool to explore the vast sea of stimulation parameters and characterise their effects on brain activity. Yet the utility of modelling stimu-lation in-silico relies on its biophysical relevance, which needs to account for the dynamics of large and diverse neural populations and how underlying networks shape those collective dynamics. The large number of param-eters to consider when constructing a model is no less than those needed to consider when planning empirical studies. This piece is centred on the application of phenomenological and biophysical models in non-invasive brain stimulation. We first introduce common forms of brain stimulation and computational models, and provide typical construction choices made when building phenomenological and biophysical models. Through the lens of four case studies, we provide an account of the questions these models can address, commonalities, and limi-tations across studies. We conclude by proposing future directions to fully realise the potential of computational models of brain stimulation for the design of personalized, efficient, and effective stimulation strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available