4.8 Article

Sensitive near-infrared circularly polarized light detection via non-fullerene acceptor blends

Journal

NATURE PHOTONICS
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages 649-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41566-023-01230-z

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We propose a widely applicable strategy to fill the spectral gap of circularly polarized light (CPL) detection in the near-infrared (NIR) region by directly inducing chiroptical activity in planar non-fullerene acceptors. This strategy is found to be effective in a wide series of state-of-the-art non-fullerene acceptor families, including ITIC5, o-IDTBR6, and Y6 analogues.
Circularly polarized light (CPL) is widely used for various applications in sensing and imaging(1-3). An ongoing challenge is to realize high-quality CPL detection using chiral organic semiconductors, especially in the near-infrared (NIR) region(4). Chiral molecules tend to rely on twisted stereogenic moieties; however, conventional approaches to reduce the bandgap of organic semiconductors are based on the use of co-planar backbones that commonly lead to molecular symmetries preventing chirality. Here we report a widely applicable strategy to directly induce chiroptical activity in planar non-fullerene acceptors(5-7), which are widely used for high-performance organic photovoltaics and provide a wealth of opportunities to fill the spectral gap of CPL detection in the NIR regime. We demonstrate proof-of-concept circularly polarized organic photodiodes using chiroptically active non-fullerene acceptor blends, which exhibit strong circular dichroism and hence great sensitivity to CPL in the NIR region. Importantly, this strategy is found to be effective in a wide series of state-of-the-art non-fullerene acceptor families including ITIC5, o-IDTBR6 and Y6 analogues(7), which substantially broadens the range of materials applicable to NIR CPL detection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available