4.7 Article

Measuring line-of-sight shear with Einstein rings: a proof of concept

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 520, Issue 4, Pages 5982-6000

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stad512

Keywords

gravitational lensing: strong; software: development; cosmology: theory

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By simulating strong lensing images, the line-of-sight shear can be accurately measured, independent of lens model parameters. Even with deficient fitting models, the recovery of the line-of-sight shear can escape degeneracies with lens model parameters, although at the cost of precision. Simulating and fitting images with multiple line-of-sight dark matter haloes verifies the validity of the tidal approximation, showing that an explicit violation of the tidal approximation does not necessarily prevent measuring the line-of-sight shear.
Line-of-sight effects in strong gravitational lensing have long been treated as a nuisance. However, it was recently proposed that the line-of-sight shear could be a cosmological observable in its own right, if it is not degenerate with lens model parameters. We first demonstrate that the line-of-sight shear can be accurately measured from a simple simulated strong lensing image with per cent precision. We then extend our analysis to more complex simulated images and stress test the recovery of the line-of-sight shear when using deficient fitting models, finding that it escapes from degeneracies with lens model parameters, albeit at the expense of the precision. Lastly, we check the validity of the tidal approximation by simulating and fitting an image generated in the presence of many line-of-sight dark matter haloes, finding that an explicit violation of the tidal approximation does not necessarily prevent one from measuring the line-of-sight shear.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available