4.6 Review

Radiolabeled Liposomes for Nuclear Imaging Probes

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 28, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules28093798

Keywords

liposomes; nuclear imaging probes; radiolabeling; radiopharmaceutical; theranostics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantitative nuclear imaging techniques are in high demand for disease diagnostics and cancer theranostics. Liposomal radiotracers have been rapidly developing as novel nuclear imaging probes, with their physicochemical properties and structural characteristics addressed for stability and specific targeting. Various radionuclide labeling methods have been summarized to obtain radiolabeled liposomes for in vivo biodistribution and targeting studies.
Quantitative nuclear imaging techniques are in high demand for various disease diagnostics and cancer theranostics. The non-invasive imaging modality requires radiotracing through the radioactive decay emission of the radionuclide. Current preclinical and clinical radiotracers, so-called nuclear imaging probes, are radioisotope-labeled small molecules. Liposomal radiotracers have been rapidly developing as novel nuclear imaging probes. The physicochemical properties and structural characteristics of liposomes have been elucidated to address their long circulation and stability as radiopharmaceuticals. Various radiolabeling methods for synthesizing radionuclides onto liposomes and synthesis strategies have been summarized to render them biocompatible and enable specific targeting. Through a variety of radionuclide labeling methods, radiolabeled liposomes for use as nuclear imaging probes can be obtained for in vivo biodistribution and specific targeting studies. The advantages of radiolabeled liposomes including their use as potential clinical nuclear imaging probes have been highlighted. This review is a comprehensive overview of all recently published liposomal SPECT and PET imaging probes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available