4.7 Article

MND1 enables homologous recombination in somatic cells primarily outside the context of replication

Journal

MOLECULAR ONCOLOGY
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages 1192-1211

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13448

Keywords

DNA damage response; double-strand breaks; homologous recombination; irradiation

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates that the meiotic recombination co-factor MND1 plays a role in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in somatic cells. MND1 localizes to DSBs and stimulates DNA repair through homologous recombination (HR). Importantly, MND1 specifically functions in the repair response to two-ended DSBs induced by irradiation (IR) or chemotherapeutic drugs, and its activity is primarily observed in the G2 phase.
Faithful and timely repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is fundamental for the maintenance of genomic integrity. Here, we demonstrate that the meiotic recombination co-factor MND1 facilitates the repair of DSBs in somatic cells. We show that MND1 localizes to DSBs, where it stimulates DNA repair through homologous recombination (HR). Importantly, MND1 is not involved in the response to replication-associated DSBs, implying that it is dispensable for HR-mediated repair of one-ended DSBs. Instead, we find that MND1 specifically plays a role in the response to two-ended DSBs that are induced by irradiation (IR) or various chemotherapeutic drugs. Surprisingly, we find that MND1 is specifically active in G2 phase, whereas it only marginally affects repair during S phase. MND1 localization to DSBs is dependent on resection of the DNA ends and seemingly occurs through direct binding of MND1 to RAD51-coated ssDNA. Importantly, the lack of MND1-driven HR repair directly potentiates the toxicity of IR-induced damage, which could open new possibilities for therapeutic intervention, specifically in HR-proficient tumors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available