4.7 Article

Activation Profile of TAS2R2, the 26th Human Bitter Taste Receptor

Journal

MOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH
Volume 67, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.202200775

Keywords

bitter taste receptor; calcium-mobilization assay; functional screening; G protein-coupled receptor; genetic variant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Humans have about 25 bitter taste receptor genes (TAS2R) to avoid ingestion of harmful substances. Variations in these genes contribute to individual differences in bitter tasting abilities. TAS2R2, initially considered a pseudogene, has been found to be a functional bitter taste receptor in some populations.
ScopeTo avoid ingestion of potentially harmful substances, humans are equipped with about 25 bitter taste receptor genes (TAS2R) expressed in oral taste cells. Humans exhibit considerable variance in their bitter tasting abilities, which are associated with genetic polymorphisms in bitter taste receptor genes. One of these variant receptor genes, TAS2R2, is initially believed to represent a pseudogene. However, TAS2R2 exists in a putative functional variant within some populations and can therefore be considered as an additional functional bitter taste receptor. Methods and resultsTo learn more about the function of the experimentally neglected TAS2R2, a functional screening with 122 bitter compounds is performed. The study observes responses with eight of the 122 bitter substances and identifies the substance phenylbutazone as a unique activator of TAS2R2 among the family of TAS2Rs, thus filling one more gap in the array of cognate bitter substances. ConclusionsThe comprehensive characterization of the receptive range of TAS2R2 allows the classification into the group of TAS2Rs with a medium number of bitter agonists. The variability of bitter taste and its potential influences on food choice in some human populations may be even higher than assumed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available