4.7 Editorial Material

It is time for ancient DNA to sweat the small stuff

Journal

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 11, Pages 2689-2691

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mec.16970

Keywords

ancient DNA; conservation genetics; fossils; nondestructive sampling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

When it comes to ancient DNA, people usually think of extinct megafauna, but the study of small vertebrates is often overlooked. This study introduces a minimally destructive method to study the ancient DNA of small vertebrates, focusing on New Zealand geckos. The researchers reconstruct the evolutionary history of these geckos and provide insights into managing remnant populations. This work not only has implications for New Zealand geckos, but also opens up opportunities for biomolecular research on small vertebrate samples in museum collections.
When one thinks of the field of ancient DNA it conjures images of extinct megafauna, from mammoths and woolly rhinos, through to the giant, flightless elephant bird (but hopefully not dinosaurs - despite the pervasive idea of 'dino DNA' from Jurassic park). These taxa have fascinating evolutionary histories, and their extinction stories need to be told. At the other end of the vertebrate scale, however, is the often neglected 'small stuff' - lizards, frogs, and other herpetofauna. But here's the rub - extracting DNA from the bones of this 'small stuff' is not only difficult, it often destroys the sample. In this issue, Scarsbrook et al. (2023) describe a new way to study the ancient (or historical) DNA of small vertebrates that is minimally destructive. The authors use the method to reconstruct the dynamic evolutionary history of New Zealand geckos and make new insights into how remnant populations should be managed. This work provides some key insights into New Zealand geckos but also opens up opportunities of biomolecular research on the smallest of vouchered vertebrate samples held within museum collections.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available