4.6 Review

Therapeutic Landscape of AXL Receptor Kinase in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Journal

MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS
Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages 818-832

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-22-0617

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Early cancer recurrence, driven by resistance to therapeutics, is a major obstacle in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). AXL overexpression has been identified as a key determinant in developing acquired resistance to treatment. AXL activation drives cancer progression and is linked to poor patient survival. There are currently no FDA-approved AXL inhibitors, but multiple inhibitors are being tested in clinical settings. This review outlines the functions and regulation of AXL, its role in resistance to therapy, and the current strategies targeting AXL, with a focus on TNBC.
◥ Early cancer recurrence, driven by resistance to therapeutics, is a major obstacle to overcome poor survival in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Recently, overexpression of AXL has been identified as one of the key molecular determinants leading to the development of acquired resistance to chemotherapy and targeted anticancer treatments. AXL overactivation drives many hallmarks of cancer progression, including cell proliferation, survival, migration, metas-tasis, drug resistance, and is linked to poor patient survival and disease recurrence. Mechanistically, AXL represents a signaling hub that regulates a complex signaling pathways crosstalk. Therefore, emerging data highlight the clinical significance of AXL as an attractive therapeutic target. Currently, there is no FDA approved AXL inhibitor but several AXL small molecule inhibitors and anti-bodies are being tested in clinical settings. In this review we outline the functions and regulation of AXL, its role in resistance to therapy, and current strategies targeting AXL with emphasis on TNBC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available