4.6 Article

Softball Pitchers' Body Segment Girths Are Associated with Varied Biomechanics at Ball Release of the Pitch

Journal

MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE
Volume 55, Issue 8, Pages 1481-1486

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003167

Keywords

SEGMENT GIRTH; BODY COMPOSITION; SEQUENCING; SOFTBALL PITCH

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aims to investigate the correlations between pitcher trunk and throwing arm girth with kinematics at ball release of the softball pitch. The results reveal that segment girth may affect pitch biomechanics, with greater girth associated with less horizontal abduction at ball release.
PurposeThe purpose of this study was to examine the relationships between pitcher trunk and throwing arm girth with kinematics at ball release of the softball pitch. Softball pitchers can be of various shapes and sizes; however, it is unknown if segment girth might influence pitch biomechanics. Because of the importance of body positioning at ball release of the windmill pitch, this study examined the relationship between segment girth and pitch biomechanics at ball release.MethodsForty-two pitchers volunteered to participate (1.706 & PLUSMN; 0.061 m, 74.98 & PLUSMN; 15.94 kg, 15.5 & PLUSMN; 1.7 yr). Participants' throwing upper arm, chest, waist, and hip girth were measured. Participants then pitched fastballs to a catcher (43 ft) while an electromagnetic motion capture system synced with a force plate and motion analysis software collected kinematic data (sampled at 240 Hz).ResultsLinear regressions revealed that upper arm, chest, and waist girth were associated with throwing arm shoulder horizontal abduction. Greater segment girth was associated with less horizontal abduction at ball release of the pitch.ConclusionsSegment girth is related to pitch biomechanics and may influence body positions at crucial softball pitch events such as ball release.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available