4.5 Article

ESR2 polymorphisms on prostate cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

MEDICINE
Volume 102, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033937

Keywords

ESR2; estrogen receptor beta; meta-analysis; prostate cancer; SNP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This meta-analysis investigated the association between two ESR2 gene polymorphisms (rs1256049 and rs4986938) and cancer susceptibility. The researchers conducted an extensive literature search and analyzed data from 10 articles that included a total of 18,064 cases and 19,556 controls. The study found that the rs1256049 polymorphism of ESR2 is associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer in Caucasians and a decreased risk in Asians, while rs4986938 is not associated with prostate cancer risk.
Background:This meta-analysis was performed to address the association of 2 ESR2 gene polymorphisms (rs1256049 and rs4986938) with susceptibility to cancer. Methods:An extensive literature search for eligible candidate gene studies published before May 10, 2022, was conducted in PubMed, Medline, and Web of Science. The search strategy was as follows: (ESR2 OR ER beta OR ER beta OR estrogen receptor beta) AND (polymorphism OR mutation OR variation OR SNP OR genotype) AND (PCa OR PC OR prostate cancer). Potential sources of heterogeneity were sought out via trial sequential analysis, subgroup, and sensitivity analysis. Results:Overall, a total of 10 articles involving 18,064 cases and 19,556 controls for 2 polymorphisms of the ESR2 gene were enrolled. In the stratified analysis of rs1256049, we found that Caucasians might be correlated with an increased risk of prostate cancer (PCa), while less susceptibility was found in Asians. We observed that rs4986938 was not associated with PCa risk. Conclusion:ESR2 rs1256049 polymorphism is associated with a higher risk of PCa in the Caucasian population and a lower risk of PCa in the Asian population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available