4.4 Article

Uveitis: Study of 109 cases

Journal

MEDICINA CLINICA
Volume 161, Issue 3, Pages 107-109

Publisher

ELSEVIER ESPANA SLU
DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2023.04.009

Keywords

Uveitis; Uveitis epidemiology; Uveitis classification; Ocular inflammation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzes and describes the anatomical and etiological classification, clinical and epidemiological characteristics, and most frequent symptoms of uveitis cases in our population. The study included 109 uveitis cases, with the most common symptoms being pain (74.31%), hyperemia (73.39%), and blurred vision (65.14%). The most frequent anatomical classification was anterior uveitis (55.96%), followed by panuveitis (18.35%), posterior uveitis (12.84%), and intermediate uveitis (7.34%). In terms of etiology, most uveitis cases were idiopathic (42.99%), followed by non-infectious (38.32%), and infectious (18.69%).
Purpose: Analyse and describe the anatomical and etiological classification, clinical and epidemiological characteristics and most frequent symptoms of uveitis cases in our population. Patients and method: Descriptive, retrospective observational study of uveitis cases treated in the Ophthalmology Department of Virgen del Rocio University Hospital in 2021. The demographic and clinical characteristics were studied.Results: A total of 109 cases of uveitis were studied, 46 men and 63 women, with a mean age of 45.43 & PLUSMN; 16.11 years. The most frequent symptoms were pain (74.31%), hyperemia (73.39%) and blurred vision (65.14%). The most frequent anatomical classification was anterior (55.96%), followed by panuveitis (18.35%), posterior (12.84%) and intermediate uveitis (7.34%). Regarding etiology, most uveitis were idiopathic (42.99%), followed by non-infectious (38.32%) and finally infectious (18.69%).Conclusions: In southern Espana, the characteristics of uveitis are similar to other studies in Western countries.& COPY; 2023 Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available