4.7 Article

Biaxial characterization of open-cell aluminum foams from macro to micro responses

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This experimental work investigated the effect of a biaxial combined compression-torsion loading complexity on the mechanical properties of two types of aluminum foams. The results showed that increasing foam density and loading complexity led to higher yield strength, energy absorption capacity, and micro-hardness. The highest foam strength was observed under the most complicated loading path for the densest foam, due to the variation in cell wall thickness. The SEM analysis revealed that the loading complexity had an impact on particle segregation and densification strain.
This experimental work aimed to understand the effect of a biaxial combined compression-torsion loading complexity on the mechanical properties of two types of aluminum foams having porosities of 85% and 80% and nominal relative densities of 15% and 20%, respectively. In this investigation, open-cell aluminum foam of highly uniform architecture with a spherical porosity was designed and used to investigate the biaxial plastic response. These foams were tested under different quasi-static complex loading paths using a patented rig, called ACTP with different torsional component rates. The key responses to be examined were yield stress, stress plateau, energy absorption capacity, densification strain, micro-hardness, and microstructure. It was revealed that the greater the density of the foam with the higher the loading complexity, the greater the yield strength, the energy absorption capacity, and the micro-hardness. The highest foam strength was thus recorded under the most complicated loading path (i.e., biaxial 60 degrees) for the densest foam (i.e., 80% porosity). This was due to the variation in the cell wall thickness. In addition, the effect of the loading complexity on the microstructure was studied using SEM. The loading complexity of biaxial-45 degrees provides higher particle segregation at the grain boundary and a larger densification strain for the 85% porosity foams.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available