4.6 Article

Achieving excellent specific yield strength in non-equiatomic TiNbZrVMo high entropy alloy via metalloid Si doping

Journal

MATERIALS LETTERS
Volume 335, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2023.133832

Keywords

High entropy alloys; Silicide; Microstructure; Mechanical properties; Metals and alloys

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Silicide phase was added to improve the mechanical properties of the Ti1.5NbZrV0.4Mo0.6 alloy. The microstructure, mechanical properties, and fracture mechanisms of Ti1.5NbZrV0.4Mo0.6Six (x = 0-0.9) high entropy alloys (HEAs) were studied. The addition of Si led to the growth of lamellar M5Si3 silicide phase in the alloy, resulting in improved yield strength and decreased density.
In this work, silicide phase was added to the single phase BCC solid solution Ti1.5NbZrV0.4Mo0.6 alloy to improve the mechanical properties. Ti1.5NbZrV0.4Mo0.6Six (x = 0-0.9, mole ratio) high entropy alloys (HEAs) was made by vacuum arc melting. The influence of Si on the microstructure, mechanical properties and fracture mechanisms of the alloy were studied. The addition of Si makes lamellar M5Si3 silicide phase grow in BCC interdendritic, and the silicides change from lamellar to coarse network. The primary BCC dendrite structure gradually changes to strip and hexagonal silicides. Si element prominently increases the yield strength and decreases the density. When x = 0.9, the alloy has yield strength of 2019.2 MPa, the elongation of 16.5% and the density of 5.91 g center dot cm-3, which exhibits a superb specific yield strength (SYS) up to 341.66 MPa center dot cm3 center dot g-1. The improvement of mechanical properties is mainly by reason of the silicide phase strengthening. The fracture mechanism changes from quasi cleavage fracture when x = 0.1 to cleavage fracture when x = 0.3-0.7, and then to intergranular fracture when x = 0.9.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available