4.6 Article

The effect of the Zn content on the electrochemical performance of Al-Zn-Sn-Ga alloys

Journal

MATERIALS CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
Volume 299, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.127510

Keywords

Aluminum anode alloy; Electrochemistry; Al-Zn-Sn-Ga; Discharge potential

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the discharge properties of aluminum anodic alloys. The microstructure, electrochemical performance, and discharge test performance of pure aluminum, Al-1Zn-Sn-Ga, and Al-5Zn-Sn-Ga alloys are compared. The results show that increasing the Zn content reduces the formation of Zn-rich and Sn-rich phases, inhibiting self-corrosion response and improving electrochemical performance.
This study investigates the discharge properties of aluminum anodic alloys. Comparison is made of the microstructure of pure aluminum, Al-1Zn-Sn-Ga, and Al-5Zn-Sn-Ga alloys as well as their electrochemical and discharge test performance. The results indicate that increasing the Zn content reduces the formation of Zn-rich and Sn-rich phases in the Al-Zn-Sn-Ga alloy matrix, thereby inhibiting the self-corrosion response of the alloy to the hydrogen evolution reaction. In addition, it is found that increasing the Zn content increases the precipitation of spherical Sn-containing nanoparticles approximately 5 nm in size in the Al-Zn-Sn-Ga alloy, enabling an effective improvement in the electrochemical performance. In addition, when the current density is increased to 150 mA/cm2, there is a significant drop in the discharge potential of pure aluminum to -0.66 V, while the discharge potentials of Al-1Zn-Sn-Ga and Al-5Zn-Sn-Ga are maintained at values of -1.25 V and -1.38 V, respectively, significantly better than that of pure aluminum. The results confirm that increasing the Zn content can improve the electrochemical performance of an Al-Zn-Sn-Ga alloy system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available