4.7 Article

Morphologies and nucleus models of 8-Sn grains in SAC305-xIn freestanding solder balls and solder joints

Journal

MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION
Volume 199, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2023.112847

Keywords

Sn-3; 0Ag-0; 5Cu; Anisotropy; Indium addition; Grain refinement; Nucleus and growth model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the morphologies of 8-Sn grains in different compositions of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5CuxIn solder balls and joints were characterized. Seven 8-Sn grain morphologies containing twinning relationship were found, and the 8-Sn grains were significantly refined when the In content exceeded 2wt%. Additionally, nucleus and growth models for the seven 8-Sn morphologies were established by combining the 8-Sn cell or cyclic twin structure with the preferred growth direction of 8-Sn dendrites.
Due to the significant anisotropy of 8-Sn in physical and mechanical properties, the reliability of Sn-based solder joints is closely related to 8-Sn grain features. In this study, the morphologies of 8-Sn grains in Sn-3.0Ag-0.5CuxIn (SAC305-xIn, x = 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10 wt%) freestanding solder balls and SAC305/Cu and SAC305/Au/Pd/Ni solder joints in two sizes were characterized. Seven 8-Sn grain morphologies that all contained twinning relationship were found in the SAC305-xIn solder balls and joints. When the content of In addition was larger than 2 wt%, the 8-Sn grains were refined significantly, regardless of solder ball size and substrate type. Four different cyclic twinning structures were established to explain the mechanism of the twin structures, i.e., {101} sixfold, {301} sixfold, {101} threefold and {301} threefold cyclic twin structures. In addition, the nucleus & growth models for the seven 8-Sn morphologies were successfully established by combining the 8-Sn cell or the cyclic twin structure with the preferred growth direction of 8-Sn dendrites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available