4.7 Article

State of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) contamination in the Saint John Harbour, New Brunswick, Canada

Journal

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
Volume 189, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.114760

Keywords

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH); Contaminants; Sediment quality guidelines (SQGs); Saint John Harbour (SJH); Wildlife risk assessment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the concentrations and compositions of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) contaminants in the surficial sediments of the Saint John Harbour (SJH) and assessed PAH exposure to local aquatic biota. The study found that sedimentary PAH contamination in the SJH is heterogeneous and widespread. Some sites exceeded recommended guidelines for the protection of aquatic life. However, no indication of effects on local nekton was observed.
This study examined the concentrations and compositions of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) contaminants in the surficial sediments of the Saint John Harbour (SJH) and assessed PAH exposure to local aquatic biota. Our findings suggest that sedimentary PAH contamination is heterogeneous and widespread in the SJH, with several sites exceeding the Canadian and NOAA recommended guidelines for the protection of aquatic life. Despite high concentrations of PAHs at some sites, there was no indication that local nekton was affected. Lack of a biological response may be due in part to a low bioavailability of sedimentary PAHs, presence of confounding factors (e.g., trace metals), and/or adaptation of local wildlife to the historic PAH contamination in this region. Overall, although no indication of effects to wildlife was observed with the data collected in the present study, continued efforts should be made to remediate highly contaminated areas and reduce the prevalence of these compounds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available