4.7 Article

Biodegradation efficacy of selected marine microalgae against Low-Density Polyethylene (LDPE): An environment friendly green approach

Journal

MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN
Volume 190, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.114889

Keywords

Biodegradation; Bioremediation; Low-Density Polyethylene; Microalgae; Marine Pollution; Plastic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study investigated the degradation ability of five marine microalgae strains on low-density polyethylene (LDPE). The results showed that Picochlorum maculatum was the most effective strain in degrading LDPE, with significant weight loss, high reduction rate, and short half-life. SEM images revealed surface erosion and ATR-FTIR spectra showed functional group peaks and new peaks, indicating the degradation of LDPE by microalgae.
The present study dealt with the five marine microalgae strains viz., Chloroidium saccharophilum, Picochlorum maculatum, Amphora sp., Hymenomonas globosa and Limnospira indica and their effective degradation ability of Low-Density Polyethylene for the period of 45 days. The incubation of LDPE in microalgae culture has resulted in the maximum weight loss (20.16 +/- 0.14 %), higher reduction rate (0.005/day) and lower half-life (138.4 days) in the LDPE treated with P. maculatum. The SEM images of all treated LDPE revealed surface erosion and the ATR-FTIR spectra showed functional group peaks along with new peaks at 1369.35 cm-1, 2332.96 cm-1 and 500-726 cm-1. Carbonyl (Keto, Ester), Vinyl and Internal double bond indices increased significantly in all the treated groups. The crystallinity was decreased (64.13 %) in P. maculatum treated LDPE than the control (71.37 %). Thermogravimetric analysis showed the reduction in thermal stability after biodegradation. This efficient microalgal degradation as a bioremediation technique will reduce the plastic pollution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available