4.4 Article

Feeding by the calanoid copepods Acartia spp. on the heterotrophic dinoflagellates Gyrodinium jinhaense, G. dominans, and G. moestrupii

Journal

MARINE BIOLOGY
Volume 170, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00227-023-04190-8

Keywords

Grazing; Ingestion; Marine; Mesozooplankton; Predator; Prey; Protist; Protozoa

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the interactions between Gyrodinium jinhaense and G. moestrupii and copepods. By determining the ingestion rate of Acartia spp. copepods on these three Gyrodinium species, the researchers found that the maximum ingestion rates on G. jinhaense and G. dominans were similar and higher than that on G. moestrupii. The ingestion rates on these Gyrodinium species were lower than some other heterotrophic dinoflagellates.
Gyrodinium jinhaense and G. moestrupii were described within the past two decades, but the interactions between these two Gyrodinium species and copepods remain to be studied. To elucidate these interactions, the ingestion rate of the calanoid copepods Acartia spp. feeding on G. jinhaense, G. dominans, and G. moestrupii was determined. The maximum ingestion rates of A. hongi/A. omorii on G. jinhaense and G. dominans (3680 and 3480 ng C predator(-1)d(-1), respectively) were similar, but they were considerably higher than that on G. moestrupii (1600 ng C predator(-1)d(-1)). The largest size and fastest swimming speed of G. moestrupii may be partially responsible for this lowest maximum ingestion rate. The ingestion rates of A. hongi/A. omorii on G. jinhaense, G. dominans, and G. moestrupii at the prey concentrations of both 50 and 100 ng C mL(-1) were higher than those on the heterotrophic dinoflagellates Pfiesteria piscicida and Luciella masanensis but lower than those on the heterotrophic dinoflagellates Stoeckeria algicida and Oxyrrhis marina. Therefore, G. jinhaense, G. dominans, and G. moestrupii are moderate heterotrophic dinoflagellate prey for Acartia spp.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available