4.7 Review

Polymeric Bowl-Shaped Nanoparticles: Hollow Structures with a Large Opening on the Surface

Journal

MACROMOLECULAR RAPID COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 44, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/marc.202300196

Keywords

amphiphilic polymer; bowl-shaped nanoparticles; nanomotor; self-assembly

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polymeric bowl-shaped nanoparticles (BNPs) are anisotropic hollow structures that have advantages in encapsulation, delivery, and release of large-sized cargoes. The preparation methods of BNPs include self-assembly, emulsion polymerization, swelling, freeze-drying, and template-assisted approaches. However, the lack of a comprehensive summary of BNPs hinders the development of this field. This review highlights the recent progress and future perspectives of BNPs.
Polymeric bowl-shaped nanoparticles (BNPs) are anisotropic hollow structures with large openings on the surface, which have shown advantages such as high specific area and efficient encapsulation, delivery and release of large-sized cargoes on demand compared to solid nanoparticles or closed hollow structures. Several strategies have been developed to prepare BNPs based on either template or template-free methods. For instance, despite the widely used self-assembly strategy, alternative methods including emulsion polymerization, swelling and freeze-drying of polymeric spheres, and template-assisted approaches have also been developed. It is attractive but still challenging to fabricate BNPs due to their unique structural features. However, there is still no comprehensive summary of BNPs up to now, which significantly hinders the further development of this field. In this review, the recent progress of BNPs will be highlighted from the perspectives of design strategies, preparation methods, formation mechanisms, and emerging applications. Moreover, the future perspectives of BNPs will also be proposed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available