4.7 Article

Influence of the Degree of Swelling on the Stiffness and Toughness of Microgel-Reinforced Hydrogels

Journal

MACROMOLECULAR RAPID COMMUNICATIONS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/marc.202200864

Keywords

granular materials; mechanical properties; microgel-reinforced hydrogels; soft matters

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The stiffness and toughness of conventional hydrogels decrease with increasing swelling, making them less suitable for load-bearing applications. However, reinforcing hydrogels with microgels can enhance their toughness. The volume fraction of microgels in the reinforced hydrogels determines their connectivity, which affects their stiffness and fracture toughness in fully swollen state.
The stiffness and toughness of conventional hydrogels decrease with increasing degree of swelling. This behavior makes the stiffness-toughness compromise inherent to hydrogels even more limiting for fully swollen ones, especially for load-bearing applications. The stiffness-toughness compromise of hydrogels can be addressed by reinforcing them with hydrogel microparticles, microgels, which introduce the double network (DN) toughening effect into hydrogels. However, to what extent this toughening effect is maintained in fully swollen microgel-reinforced hydrogels (MRHs) is unknown. Herein, it is demonstrated that the initial volume fraction of microgels contained in MRHs determines their connectivity, which is closely yet nonlinearly related to the stiffness of fully swollen MRHs. Remarkably, if MRHs are reinforced with a high volume fraction of microgels, they stiffen upon swelling. By contrast, the fracture toughness linearly increases with the effective volume fraction of microgels present in the MRHs regardless of their degree of swelling. These findings provide a universal design rule for the fabrication of tough granular hydrogels that stiffen upon swelling and hence, open up new fields of use of these hydrogels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available