4.5 Article

Opening Pores and Extending the Application Window: Open-Cell Nanocellular Foams

Journal

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/mame.202300087

Keywords

filtration; gas diffusion barrier approaches; gas dissolution foaming; open-cell nanostructures; skinless nanocellular foams

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study presents a method for producing open-cell nanostructures in polymer foams without solid skins by gas dissolution foaming. MAM block copolymer is used as a heterogeneous phase to produce the open-cell structures, and AFM and extensional rheology are utilized to understand the main features. The gas diffusion barrier approach is employed to prevent the appearance of solid skins, and the influence of poly(vinyl alcohol) barrier and MAM copolymer on the solid skins' formation is analyzed.
The production of open-cell (OC) nanostructures in polymer foams without non-foamed solid skins by gas dissolution foaming has been developed in this work. First, several grades of MAM block copolymer (methyl methacrylate-b-butyl acrylate-b-methyl methacrylate) at high content are employed as heterogeneous phase in poly(methyl methacrylate) for producing OC structures. Atomic force microscopy and extensional rheology are used as methods to understand the main features to obtain OC nanocellular structures. Second, the gas diffusion barrier approach is employed for the first time in polymer blends to avoid the appearance of the solid skins in the borders, which typically appears when the cellular polymer is produced by gas dissolution foaming. The influence of the poly(vinyl alcohol) gas diffusion barrier is analyzed, together with the effect of heterogeneous nucleation provided by MAM copolymer, on the solid skins' formation. The synergy between both approaches allows obtaining porous nanocellular polymeric films with an OC structure non-constrained by the presence of outer solid skins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available