4.5 Review

Mechanistic PK/PD modeling to address early-stage biotherapeutic dosing feasibility questions

Journal

MABS
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/19420862.2023.2192251

Keywords

Dosing feasibility; drug discovery; drug properties; mechanistic PK; PD; MID3; optimal design

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The early assessment of dosing requirements is crucial in the development of biotherapeutics. If a high dose is needed for desired efficacy, it may not be feasible or commercially viable to develop the drug unless measures are taken to increase concentration or yield. Understanding the impact of target selection, drug format, and properties on dosing requirements can inform early decisions.
Early assessment of dosing requirements should be an integral part of developability assessments for a discovery program. If a very high dose is required to achieve the desired pharmacological effect, it may not be clinically feasible or commercially desirable to develop the biotherapeutic for the selected target unless extra measures are taken to develop a high concentration formulation or maximize yield during manufacturing. A quantitative understanding of the impact of target selection, biotherapeutic format, and optimal drug properties on potential dosing requirements to achieve efficacy can affect many early decisions. Early prediction of dosing requirements for biotherapeutics, as opposed to small molecules, is possible due to a strong influence of target biology on pharmacokinetics and dosing. Mechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models leverage knowledge and competitor data available at an early stage of drug development, including biophysics of the target(s) and disease physiology, to rationally inform drug design criteria. Here we review how mathematical mechanistic PK/PD modeling can and has been applied to guide early drug development decisions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available