4.6 Article

Forewarned Is Forearmed? Contingent Sourcing, Shipment Information, and Supplier Competition

Journal

M&SOM-MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages 1796-1813

Publisher

INFORMS
DOI: 10.1287/msom.2021.0540

Keywords

contingent sourcing; supply risk; supplier competition; shipment information

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dual sourcing and contingent sourcing are important risk mitigation strategies for managing supply chain risks, particularly transportation-related losses of inbound orders. Shipment information, obtained through in-transit inspection points or monitoring technologies, enables contingent sourcing as a means of managing transportation risk. This study examines the impact of contingent sourcing and shipment information in a setting where a buyer can source from two competing suppliers.
Problem definition: Dual sourcing and contingent sourcing are important risk mitigation strategies to manage supply chain risks, including transportation-related losses of inbound orders. Contingent sourcing as a means of managing transportation risk is made possible by shipment information realized at in-transit inspection points or through shipment monitoring technologies. We examine the impact of contingent sourcing and shipment information in a setting where a buyer can source from two competing suppliers. One supplier (unreliable) has a long transportation lead time and is prone to in-transit yield loss; the other supplier (reliable) has a short, but nonzero, lead time with no yield loss. Methodology/results: We analyze a multistage game-theoretical model in which the two suppliers compete on wholesale prices and then, the buyer determines initial order quantities. Later, the buyer can place an emergency order with the reliable supplier based on shipment information, which reveals (possibly imperfectly) the status of the in-transit order from the unreliable supplier. We show that the buyer will adopt one of four possible sourcing strategies: (1) initially source only from the unreliable supplier but resort to the reliable supplier contingent on the updated shipment information, (2) diversify its initial order across the two suppliers but resort to the reliable supplier if needed, (3) diversify its initial order and not engage in contingent sourcing, or (4) sole source from the reliable supplier. Interestingly, contingent sourcing may or may not benefit the buyer because it may soften the competition between suppliers. Moreover, the buyer's profit may not be monotonic in the accuracy of shipment information. Managerial implications: The buyer must design its supply base so that the unreliable supplier is particularly cost efficient if the buyer is to benefit from the possibility of contingent sourcing. The buyer may not always benefit from operational improvements that enhance shipment information accuracy because they may soften supplier competition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available