4.5 Article

Evaluating the outcomes of donor-recipient age differences in young adults undergoing liver transplantation

Journal

LIVER TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 29, Issue 8, Pages 793-803

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/LVT.0000000000000109

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The current liver allocation system may disadvantage younger adult recipients by not considering the age difference between donors and recipients. This study aimed to investigate the long-term prognostic influence of the donor-recipient age difference in young adult recipients. The results showed that a larger age difference in younger recipients was associated with inferior long-term survival, highlighting the importance of considering age in liver transplantation.
The current liver allocation system may be disadvantaging younger adult recipients as it does not incorporate the donor-recipient age difference. Given the longer life expectancy of younger recipients, the influences of older donor grafts on their long-term prognosis should be elucidated. This study sought to reveal the long-term prognostic influence of the donor-recipient age difference in young adult recipients. Adult patients who received initial liver transplants from deceased donors between 2002 and 2021 were identified from the UNOS database. Young recipients (patients 45 years old or below) were categorized into 4 groups: donor age younger than the recipient, 0-9 years older, 10-19 years older, or 20 years older or above. Older recipients were defined as patients 65 years old or above. To examine the influence of the age difference in long-term survivors, conditional graft survival analysis was conducted on both younger and older recipients. Among 91,952 transplant recipients, 15,170 patients were 45 years old or below (16.5%); these were categorized into 6,114 (40.3%), 3,315 (21.9%), 2,970 (19.6%), and 2,771 (18.3%) for groups 1-4, respectively. Group 1 demonstrated the highest probability of survival, followed by groups 2, 3, and 4 for the actual graft survival and conditional graft survival analyses. In younger recipients who survived at least 5 years post-transplant, inferior long-term survival was observed when there was an age difference of 10 years or above (86.9% vs. 80.6%, log-rank p<0.01), whereas there was no difference in older recipients (72.6% vs. 74.2%, log-rank p=0.89). In younger patients who are not in emergent need of a transplant, preferential allocation of younger aged donor offers would optimize organ utility by increasing postoperative graft survival time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available