4.7 Article

Venetoclax consolidation in high-risk CLL treated with ibrutinib for ≥1 year achieves a high rate of undetectable MRD

Journal

LEUKEMIA
Volume 37, Issue 7, Pages 1444-1453

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41375-023-01901-4

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study added venetoclax to patients who had received ibrutinib for >=12 months and had >=1 high risk feature in CLL. The results showed a high rate of U-MRD4 in the bone marrow at 12 months, suggesting a potential for durable treatment-free remission. This has important implications for patients who require long-term therapy with ibrutinib.
Patients receiving ibrutinib for CLL rarely achieve undetectable measurable residual disease (U-MRD), necessitating indefinite therapy, with cumulative risks of treatment discontinuation due to progression or adverse events. This study added venetoclax to ibrutinib for up to 2 years, in patients who had received ibrutinib for >= 12 months (mo) and had >= 1 high risk feature (TP53 mutation and/or deletion, ATM deletion, complex karyotype or persistently elevated beta(2)-microglobulin). The primary endpoint was U-MRD with 10(-4) sensitivity (U-MRD4) in bone marrow (BM) at 12mo. Forty-five patients were treated. On intention-to-treat analysis, 23/42 (55%) patients improved their response to CR (2 pts were in MRD + CR at venetoclax initiation). U-MRD4 at 12mo was 57%. 32/45 (71%) had U-MRD at the completion of venetoclax: 22/32 stopped ibrutinib; 10 continued ibrutinib. At a median of 41 months from venetoclax initiation, 5/45 patients have progressed; none have died from CLL or Richter Transformation. In 32 patients with BM U-MRD4, peripheral blood (PB) MRD4 was analyzed every 6 months; 10/32 have had PB MRD re-emergence at a median of 13 months post-venetoclax. In summary, the addition of venetoclax in patients treated with >= 12mo of ibrutinib achieved high rate of BM U-MRD4 and may achieve durable treatment-free remission.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available