3.9 Article

Correlation between Fall Dormancy and Production Performance of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa)

Journal

LEGUME RESEARCH
Volume 46, Issue 8, Pages 1006-1012

Publisher

AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATION CENTRE
DOI: 10.18805/LRF-741

Keywords

Fall dormancy; Medicago sativa; Nutrient compositions; Winter survival rate; Yield

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found a significant negative correlation between FD rating and WSR, with Gongnong No. 2 having the highest DMY and crude protein content. Additionally, Zhaodong had the lowest neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber content among the varieties tested.
Background: Selection for fall dormancy (FD) in alfalfa (Medicago sativa) can impact other traits, including dry matter yield (DMY), winter survival rate (WSR) and nutrient compositions. The current study was aimed to screen alfalfa varieties with greater yield, good quality and strong winter survival ability and thus are more suitable for planting in Heilongjiang, China and may be suitable for similar upper-latitude semiarid environments in the world.Methods: Eight alfalfa varieties (Zhaodong, Gongnong No. 2, Caribou, Gold Empress, Adrenalin, Sanditi, Sardi and WL525) were planted in regional test based on randomized block design and mowed during the early flowering stage from 2019 to 2021. The DMY, WSR and nutrient compositions were measured by weighing method, field investigation and chemical test, respectively.Result: There was a significant negative correlation (P<0.01) between the FD rating and WSR, with a correlation coefficient of 0.956. The three-year average DMY of Gongnong No. 2 was the greatest (12,745.65 kg ha(-1)) and there was a significant negative correlation (0.766, P<0.01) between the FD rating and DMY. The crude protein content of Gongnong No. 2 was greater (19.29%) than the other varieties. The Zhaodong had the least neutral detergent fiber (47.76%) and acid detergent fiber (30.79% ).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available